Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) cause nonbloody (NBD) and bloody diarrhea (BD), and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Cattle have been described as their main reservoir. STEC O157:H7 is recognized as the predominant serotype in clinical infections, but much less is known about the dominant subtypes in humans and animals or their genetic relatedness. The aims of this study were to compare the STEC O157 subtypes found in sporadic human [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorDel Castillo, Lourdes
dc.contributor.authorD’Astek, Beatriz A.
dc.contributor.authorMiliwebsky, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorCarbonari, Claudia Carolina
dc.contributor.authorPalladino, Pablo Martin
dc.contributor.authorDeza, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorChinen, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorManfredi, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorLeotta, Gerardo A.
dc.contributor.authorMasana, Marcelo Oscar
dc.contributor.authorRivas, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-08T11:05:38Z
dc.date.available2019-05-08T11:05:38Z
dc.date.issued2012-05-02
dc.identifier.issn1535-3141
dc.identifier.issn1556-7125
dc.identifier.otherhttp://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.1062
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/fpd.2011.1062
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5063
dc.description.abstractShiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) cause nonbloody (NBD) and bloody diarrhea (BD), and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Cattle have been described as their main reservoir. STEC O157:H7 is recognized as the predominant serotype in clinical infections, but much less is known about the dominant subtypes in humans and animals or their genetic relatedness. The aims of this study were to compare the STEC O157 subtypes found in sporadic human infections with those in the bovine reservoir using stx-genotyping, phage typing, and XbaI– pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and correlate the subtypes with the severity of clinical manifestations. The 280 STEC O157:H7 strains collected included in this study were isolated from HUS (n = 122), BD (n = 69), and NBD (n = 30) cases, and healthy carriers (n = 5), and from bovines (n = 54) in the abattoirs. The stx-genotyping showed that stx2/stx2c(vh-a) was predominant in human (76.1%) and in bovine strains (55.5%), whereas the second more important genotype was stx2 (20.8%) in human and stx2c(vh-a) (16.7%) in cattle strains. In human strains, PT4 (37.6%), PT49 (24.3%), and PT2 (18.6%) were the most frequent PTs (80.5%). In bovine isolates, PT2 (26%), PT39 (16.7%), and PT4 and PT49 (11.1% each) were predominant. By XbaI-PFGE, all 280 strains yielded 148 patterns with 75% similarity, and 169 strains were grouped in 37 clusters. Identical PT-PFGE-stx profile combinations were detected in strains of both origins: PT4-AREXH01.0011-stx2/stx2c(vh-a) (12 humans and one bovine), PT4-AREXH01.0543-stx2/stx2c(vh-a) (one human and four bovines), PT2-AREXH01.0076-stx2/stx2c(vh-a) (one human and four bovines), PT49-AREXH01.0175-stx2/stx2c(vh-a) (seven humans and one bovine), and PT49- AREXH01.0022-stx2/stx2c(vh-a) (seven humans and one bovine). No correlation was found among the stx-genotypes, the phage type, and the clinical symptoms.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceFoodborne Pathogens and Disease 9 (5) : 457-464 (2012)es_AR
dc.subjectEscherichia colies_AR
dc.subjectCattleeng
dc.subjectGanado Bovinoes_AR
dc.subjectEnfermedades de los Animales
dc.subjectAnimal Diseaseseng
dc.subjectIdentificación
dc.subjectIdentificationeng
dc.subjectArgentina
dc.subject.otherEscherichia coli O157:H7es_AR
dc.subject.otherStrains Isolatedes_AR
dc.titleSubtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Strains Isolated from Human Infections and Healthy Cattle in Argentinaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.filFil: Del Castillo, Lourdes L. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: D’Astek, Beatriz A. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Miliwebsky, Elizabeth. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carbonari, Claudia Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Palladino, Pablo Martin. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Deza, Natalia. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Chinen, Isabel. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Manfredi, Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Leotta, Gerardo A. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Masana, Marcelo Oscar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Rivas, Marta. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS ‘‘Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán’’. Servicio Fisiopatogenia; Argentina.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem