Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
We compared cow-calf contacts, as well as movement, activity, and pasture use patterns of heritage Raramuri Criollo (RC) and desert-adapted commercial Angus Hereford crossbred (AH) beef cattle grazing Chihuahuan Desert pastures during 4 wk in the summers of 2016 and 2017. Within each herd of 11 cow-calf pairs, a group of 7−9 randomly selected cows were fitted with Global Positioning System collars that recorded animal position at 10-min intervals. [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorNyamuryekung’e, Shelemia
dc.contributor.authorCibils, Andres Francisco
dc.contributor.authorEstell, Richard E.
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorVanLeeuwen, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Caitriana
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Alfredo
dc.contributor.authorSpiegal, Sheri
dc.contributor.authorContinanza, Fatima Guadalupe
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-28T10:09:06Z
dc.date.available2022-11-28T10:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.11.001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13452
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742420301299
dc.description.abstractWe compared cow-calf contacts, as well as movement, activity, and pasture use patterns of heritage Raramuri Criollo (RC) and desert-adapted commercial Angus Hereford crossbred (AH) beef cattle grazing Chihuahuan Desert pastures during 4 wk in the summers of 2016 and 2017. Within each herd of 11 cow-calf pairs, a group of 7−9 randomly selected cows were fitted with Global Positioning System collars that recorded animal position at 10-min intervals. Proximity loggers configured to record contact events (< 1-m radius) were fitted on a subset of five cow-calf pairs of each breed. The effect of breed on cow-calf contacts, as well as the dams’ movement, activity, and pasture use patterns were analyzed via mixed analysis of variance models. A higher number of RC cow-calf contacts occurred while the dam was grazing and traveling compared with AH counterparts (P ≤ 0.05). No breed-related differences were observed in the overall number and duration of cow-calf contact events. Compared with AH dams, RC cows traveled farther each day (RC: 7.51 vs. AH: 4.85 km, P < 0.01) at higher movement velocities (5.46 vs. 3.53 m. min−1, P < 0.01) and spent more time traveling (1.05 vs. 0.48 h, P < 0.01), more time grazing (9.37 vs. 7.45 h, P < 0.01), and less time resting (13.07 vs. 15.68 h, P < 0.01). RC cows explored almost three times more daily area than AH (152.30 vs. 57.69 ha, P = 0.01) but spent similar amounts of time within 200 m and 100 m of a drinker. RC calves explored larger daily areas than their AH counterparts (83.0 vs. 20.8 ha, P = 0.05), but no breed differences were detected in the number of contact events near drinkers. RC calves possibly impose fewer constraints on their dams’ movement and activity patterns compared with commonly used British crossbreds when grazing the Chihuahuan Desert during summer.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceRangeland Ecology & Management 74 : 43-49 (January 2021)es_AR
dc.subjectPastoreoes_AR
dc.subjectGrazingeng
dc.subjectComportamiento Animales_AR
dc.subjectAnimal Behavioureng
dc.subjectRazas de Ganadoes_AR
dc.subjectLivestock Breedseng
dc.subjectHerencia Genéticaes_AR
dc.subjectGenetic Inheritanceeng
dc.subject.otherRaza Anguses_AR
dc.subject.otherRarámuris Criolloses_AR
dc.titleForaging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patternses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cibils, Andres F. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Estell, Richard E. US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: McIntosh, Matthew. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: VanLeeuwen, Dawn. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Steele, Caitriana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: González, Alfredo. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Spiegal, Sheri. Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Continanza, Fátima Guadalupe. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem