Show simple item record

resumen

Abstract
One of the main challenges of using low plant densities in restrictive and variable environments is to maximize the use of resources in better-than-expected years. The adoption of prolific genotypes has addressed part of this problematic, through an increase in reproductive plasticity. However, tillering could be an alternative to increase reproductive and vegetative plasticity, this latter is generally low in single shoot crops. The objectives of this [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorMassigoge, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Javier A.
dc.contributor.authorEcharte, Laura
dc.contributor.authorCiampitti, Ignacio A.
dc.contributor.authorCerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro
dc.dateinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2023-08-12
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T13:10:57Z
dc.date.available2022-08-12T13:10:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.identifier.issn1435-0653
dc.identifier.issn0011-183X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20827
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12580
dc.identifier.urihttps://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csc2.20827
dc.description.abstractOne of the main challenges of using low plant densities in restrictive and variable environments is to maximize the use of resources in better-than-expected years. The adoption of prolific genotypes has addressed part of this problematic, through an increase in reproductive plasticity. However, tillering could be an alternative to increase reproductive and vegetative plasticity, this latter is generally low in single shoot crops. The objectives of this study were (i) to characterize the correlation between environmental conditions, tillers’ traits (tillers per unit area, tillers´ ears per unit area, tillers grain yield), crop grain yield, and grain yield advantages due to tillers, (ii) to determine the grain yield response to tillering (i.e., grain yield difference between tillered and non-tillered crops) for a wide range of environments, and (iii) to evaluate the impact of tiller presence on grain yield of the main shoot, considering its effect on the apical and sub-apical ears. Tillered and non-tillered crops were evaluated under rainfed conditions during two seasons (2018/19 and 2019/20). These experiments were carried out at 11 sites in the southern Argentinean Pampas, varying sowing date (22 October to 5 December), plant density (2-3 pl m−2), genotype (AX7784 and AX7761), and soil depth. Grain yield (3.2-11.9 Mg ha−1) was correlated with tillers productivity, mainly explained by post-flowering precipitations. The contribution of tillers to grain yield was more proportional than their consequent yield depression at the main shoot. Tillers either increased (3 sites) or maintained (8 sites) grain yield and, their contribution increased as the environment improved without any detrimental effect in the most restrictive environments. Tillering has the potential for increasing resource (radiation, water, nitrogen) use efficiency under low plant density strategies adopted for restrictive environments.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWileyes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceCrop Science (First published: 05 August 2022)es_AR
dc.subjectMaízes_AR
dc.subjectMaizeeng
dc.subjectRendimientoes_AR
dc.subjectYieldseng
dc.subjectMacollamientoes_AR
dc.subjectTilleringeng
dc.subjectPoblación Vegetales_AR
dc.subjectPlant Populationeng
dc.subjectMedio Ambientees_AR
dc.subjectEnvironmenteng
dc.subjectPlasticidad
dc.subjectPlasticityeng
dc.titleContribution of tillers to maize yield stability at low plant densityes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Barrowes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Massigoge, Ignacio. Universidad Nacional de Mar Del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Massigoge, Ignacio. Kansas State University. Department of Agronomy; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ross, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Barrow; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fernandez, Javier A. Kansas State University. Department of Agronomy; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Echarte, Laura. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Echarte, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ciampitti, Ignacio A. Kansas State University. Department of Agronomy; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cerrudo, Anibal Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cerrudo, Anibal Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cerrudo, Anibal Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cerrudo, Anibal Alejandro. University of Minnesota. Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

common

Show simple item record