View Item
- xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros e Institutos de InvestigaciónCIAP. Centro de Investigaciones AgropecuariasInstituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco SemiáridoArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
- DSpace Home
- Centros e Institutos de Investigación
- CIAP. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias
- Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido
- Artículos científicos
- View Item
Comparison of two coprological methods for the diagnosis of Eurytrema ssp. in cattle and sheep
Abstract
Eurytrematosis is a disease caused by flukes of the genus Eurytrema. These parasites infect the
pancreatic ducts of a wide variety of species, including cattle, sheep and humans. Diagnosing
eurytrematosis through the analysis of faecal samples can be difficult because most of the available
techniques are considered of low sensitivity. In this context, a modification of the Dennis,
Stone and Swanson technique (Belem Sedimentation Technique, BST) was
[ver mas...]
Eurytrematosis is a disease caused by flukes of the genus Eurytrema. These parasites infect the
pancreatic ducts of a wide variety of species, including cattle, sheep and humans. Diagnosing
eurytrematosis through the analysis of faecal samples can be difficult because most of the available
techniques are considered of low sensitivity. In this context, a modification of the Dennis,
Stone and Swanson technique (Belem Sedimentation Technique, BST) was previously developed
to increase the probability of detecting infected animals; nevertheless, the values of eggs per
gram obtained using the modified technique are generally low. We proposed a modification
of the this technique (MBST), to increase the sensitivity and detection rate of infected animals.
The objective of this work was to describe MBST and compare it with BST. Faecal samples of
212 clinically healthy animals (174 from cattle and 38 from sheep) from 20 farms were taken by
the intra-rectal route and stored at 4°C. The samples were processed using BST and MBST.
Positive samples amounted to 55 (25.9%) using BST and 121 (57.1%) using MBST. In the simples
from cattle, 52 (29.8%) and 107 (61.4%) were positive in BST and MBST, respectively. In
sheep, three (7.8%) and 14 (36.8%) positive samples were obtained in BST and MBST,
respectively.The results obtained using the two methods were significantly different, indicating
a lack of agreement between their findings. The results suggest that MBST is a more sensitive
method to detect Eurytrema spp. eggs in faeces than BST.
[Cerrar]
Author
Fuente
Journal of Helminthology 96 : e53 (2022)
Date
2022-07-27
Editorial
Cambridge University Press
ISSN
0022-149X
1475-2697 (online)
1475-2697 (online)
Documentos Relacionados
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Proyectos
(ver más)
INTA/2019-PEM-E5-I702-001/2019-PEM-E5-I702-001/AR./Caracterización de la euritremosis en rumiantes en Misiones – Aportes para su control
Palabras Claves
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)