Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
1. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of probiotics on the growth performance of broilers. PubMed, Scopus and Scholar Google databases were searched in all languages from 1980 to 2012. The studies in the meta-analysis were only selected if they were randomised and controlled experiments using broilers without apparent disease and the results were published in peer-reviewed journals. 2. A total of 48 and 46 studies were included [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorBlajman, Jesica E.
dc.contributor.authorFrizzo, Laureano Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorZbrun, María Virginia
dc.contributor.authorAstesana, Diego Martín
dc.contributor.authorFusari, Marcia Lucia
dc.contributor.authorSoto, Lorena Paola
dc.contributor.authorRosmini, Marcelo Raúl
dc.contributor.authorSignorini, Marcelo
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T15:15:22Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T15:15:22Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.issn0007-1668
dc.identifier.issn1466-1799
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.931930
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071668.2014.931930
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2778
dc.description.abstract1. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of probiotics on the growth performance of broilers. PubMed, Scopus and Scholar Google databases were searched in all languages from 1980 to 2012. The studies in the meta-analysis were only selected if they were randomised and controlled experiments using broilers without apparent disease and the results were published in peer-reviewed journals. 2. A total of 48 and 46 studies were included to assess probiotic effects on body weight gain (BWG) and feed efficiency (FE), respectively. Probiotics increased BWG compared to controls (SMD = 0.661, 95% CI 0.499 to 0.822) and improved FE (SMD = − 0.281, 95% CI −0.404 to −0.157) in the pooled standardised mean difference random effect model, considering the source of heterogeneity and publication biases. However, there are evidences of publication bias and heterogeneity, so the results of this meta-analysis should be considered with caution. Applying the Duval and Tweedie’s trim-and-fill methods, the adjusted value for BWG was 0.0594 (95% CI −0.122 to 0.242), and the adjusted value for FE did not show any modifications. 3. The meta-analysis showed that application of probiotics via water resulted in greater BGW and FE than administration through the feed. The effect was not related to the use of mono-strain or multi-strain probiotics, although it may depend on the strain used. The number of broilers and the duration of the experiments had an impact on the outcomes. 4. Additional studies should be conducted with the aim to identify the covariates which can explain the differences in the estimated effect sizes.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceBritish Poultry Science 55 (4) : 483-494 (2014)es_AR
dc.subjectPollo de Engordees_AR
dc.subjectBroiler Chickenseng
dc.subjectPeríodo de Crecimientoes_AR
dc.subjectGrowth Periodeng
dc.subjectProbióticoses_AR
dc.subjectProbioticseng
dc.subjectExperimentaciónes_AR
dc.subjectExperimentationeng
dc.subjectPeso Corporales_AR
dc.subjectBody Weighteng
dc.titleProbiotics and broiler growth performance: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Rafaelaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Blajman, Jesica E. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Frizzo, Laureano Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Zbrun, María Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Astesana, Diego Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fusari, Marcia Lucia. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Soto, Lorena Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Rosmini, Marcelo Raúl. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Signorini, Marcelo. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem