Show simple item record

resumen

Abstract
The aim of this study was to find ways to improve the forage yield of grass-legume mixtures without compromising soil biodiversity. In Argentinean Patagonia, the effects of applying cattle dry manure (M) and urea (U) (0, 60, 120, or 240 kg N ha−1 year−1) were assessed on herbage production of irrigated fescue-lotus mixtures, as well as on the activity/abundance of autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and N-fixing rhizobium bacteria. We hypothesised [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorOyharcabal, Estefanía
dc.contributor.authorCovacevich, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorBain, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorAcuña, Claudina Soledad
dc.contributor.authorBerone, German Dario
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-04T12:43:39Z
dc.date.available2024-04-04T12:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.identifier.issn0142-5242
dc.identifier.issn1365-2494
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12656
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/17288
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12656
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to find ways to improve the forage yield of grass-legume mixtures without compromising soil biodiversity. In Argentinean Patagonia, the effects of applying cattle dry manure (M) and urea (U) (0, 60, 120, or 240 kg N ha−1 year−1) were assessed on herbage production of irrigated fescue-lotus mixtures, as well as on the activity/abundance of autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and N-fixing rhizobium bacteria. We hypothesised that manure has advantages over urea in increasing forage yields while maintaining the proportion of legumes and root-associated microbiota. The 120 U, 240 U, and 240 M resulted in the greatest forage production; however, yield varied depending on the source applied. The high productivity of the 120 U and 240 U was probably due to the fast grass growth immediately after fertilization, which resulted in a depressed growth of the legume. The high yield of the swards fertilized with 240 M was probably due to slight and delayed growth of grass without legume yield decline. The highest radiation interception was found in swards with a low legume proportion, suggesting a light competition from grass fertilized with the highest urea doses, which were also consistent with the highest N and P nutritional status. The microbial activity/abundance were not affected by fertilization, but the final number of nodules was positively associated with the legume proportion. In conclusion, manure fertilization increased forage yield of the mixtures, while preserving the legume proportion and the root-associated microbiota. Our findings aid in reducing synthetic-N fertilizers applied in pasture-based livestock systems.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWileyes_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I007-001, Incremento sostenible de la producción y utilización de pasturas y forrajes conservadoses_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2023-PE-L01-I037, Desarrollo de sistemas de producción ganaderos climáticamente inteligentes para la Norpatagoniaes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceGrass and Forage Science : 1-13. (First published: 24 March 2024)es_AR
dc.subjectRendimiento del Forrajees_AR
dc.subjectForage Yieldeng
dc.subjectAbonos Orgánicoses_AR
dc.subjectOrganic Fertilizerseng
dc.subjectGanado Bovinoes_AR
dc.subjectCattleeng
dc.subjectAplicación de Abonoses_AR
dc.subjectFertilizer Applicationeng
dc.subjectGramineases_AR
dc.subjectGrasseseng
dc.subjectLeguminosases_AR
dc.subjectLegumeseng
dc.subjectMicorrizas Arbusculareses_AR
dc.subjectArbuscular Mycorrhizaeng
dc.titleCattle dry manure fertilization increases forage yield of grass-legume mixtures, while maintaining the legume proportion and root-associated microbiotaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Chubutes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Oyharcabal, Estefanía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Oyharcabal, Estefanía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Covacevich, Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Biotecnología; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Covacevich, Fernanda. Fundación para Investigaciones Biológicas Aplicadas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Covacevich, Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bain, Ingrid. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Acuña, Claudina Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Berone, German Dario. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Berone, German Dario. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

common

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess