Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The current silvicultural prescriptions for Nothofagus are designed to stimulate natural regeneration by opening the canopy. One of these methods is variable retention, which can include either or both aggregated and dispersed retention. Different degrees of retention may modify microclimatic variables differently and consequently offer dissimilar microenvironmental conditions for regeneration. Retained canopy influences both biotic and abiotic factors. [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pastur, Guillermo José
dc.contributor.authorCellini, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorLencinas, María Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorBarrera, Marcelo Daniel
dc.contributor.authorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-08T11:42:22Z
dc.date.available2022-08-08T11:42:22Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifier.citationMartínez Pastur G.; Cellini J.M.; Lencinas M.V.; Barrera M.; Peri P.L. (2011) Environmental variables influencing regeneration of Nothofagus pumilio in a system with combined aggregated and dispersed retention. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 178-186.es_AR
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12520
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811271000592X
dc.description.abstractThe current silvicultural prescriptions for Nothofagus are designed to stimulate natural regeneration by opening the canopy. One of these methods is variable retention, which can include either or both aggregated and dispersed retention. Different degrees of retention may modify microclimatic variables differently and consequently offer dissimilar microenvironmental conditions for regeneration. Retained canopy influences both biotic and abiotic factors. The objective was to evaluate Nothofagus pumilio regeneration along edge-related gradients within aggregated retention, and in the differentmicroenvironments within the harvested areas. The remnant canopy cover after harvesting greatly influenced regeneration mainly by decreasing radiation transmittance and soil moisture availability. Aspect (direction to the azimuth) and distance from edge of aggregates influenced regeneration density, height and growth. In dispersed retention, microenvironments generated by different types of understory plant cover, debris, and proximity of remnant trees also influenced regeneration. High levels of understory cover (up 50%) and medium levels of harvesting debris cover (25–50%) had a positive impact, while close proximity to remnant trees had a negative impact on regeneration. These findings can be used to improve silvicultural and harvesting prescriptions to ensure successful establishment of regeneration and maximize potential growth.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceForest Ecology and Management 261: 178-186 (January 2011)es_AR
dc.subjectPrimary Forestseng
dc.subjectBosque Primarioes_AR
dc.subjectNothofagus pumilioes_AR
dc.subjectSilvicultureeng
dc.subjectSilviculturaes_AR
dc.subjectSustainable Forestryeng
dc.subjectGestión Sostenible de los Bosqueses_AR
dc.subjectLighteng
dc.subjectLuzes_AR
dc.subjectSoil Water Contenteng
dc.subjectContenido de Agua del Sueloes_AR
dc.subjectTierra del Fuego (Argentina)es_AR
dc.subject.otherAggregated Retentioneng
dc.subject.otherRetención Agregadaes_AR
dc.subject.otherLengaes_AR
dc.subject.otherDispersed Retentioneng
dc.subject.otherRetención Dispersaes_AR
dc.subject.otherRegión Patagónicaes_AR
dc.titleEnvironmental variables influencing regeneration of Nothofagus pumilio in a system with combined aggregated and dispersed retentiones_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Santa Cruzes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC). Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de la Plata (UNLP). Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Maderas. La Plata, Buenos Aires; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC). Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Barrera, Marcelo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de la Plata (UNLP). Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Maderas. La Plata, Buenos Aires; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA). Santa Cruz; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Argentina.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem