Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Increasing shrub density hinders cattle raising in central Argentina rangelands. While roller- chopping and hand-cutting are used to remove shrubs and make land accessible for cattle grazing, studies on the effects of these practices on ecosystem composition, structure and functioning are scarce. We assessed the impact of shrub removal on (a) vegetation cover, composition, species richness and diversity and (b) green biomass and seasonal phenological [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorGuzman, Luis Miguel
dc.contributor.authorVillagra, Pablo Eugenio
dc.contributor.authorQuiroga, Raul Emiliano
dc.contributor.authorPereyra, Diego Ivan
dc.contributor.authorPelliza, Ernesto Martin
dc.contributor.authorRicarte, Ramon Armando
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Lisandro Javier
dc.coverage.spatialChaco Central .......... (general region) (World, South America, Argentina)es_AR
dc.coverage.spatial1111937es_AR
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-23T14:03:36Z
dc.date.available2023-03-23T14:03:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1036-9872
dc.identifier.issn1834-7541 (Online)
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1071/RJ22040
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/14318
dc.description.abstractIncreasing shrub density hinders cattle raising in central Argentina rangelands. While roller- chopping and hand-cutting are used to remove shrubs and make land accessible for cattle grazing, studies on the effects of these practices on ecosystem composition, structure and functioning are scarce. We assessed the impact of shrub removal on (a) vegetation cover, composition, species richness and diversity and (b) green biomass and seasonal phenological dynamics. We used a randomised design with three treatments (degraded rangeland; roller-chopping and hand-cutting) with four replicates, and compared the treatments with the least disturbed woodland (conserved woodland). Cenchrus ciliaris L. was sown following removal treatments and grass cover increased significantly (45% roller-chopping and 84% hand-cutting vs 27% degraded rangeland, and 13% conserved woodland), and tree cover decreased (3% roller-chopping and 2% hand-cutting vs 16% degraded rangeland, and 23% conserved woodland). Shrub cover reached 45% under roller- chopping, similar to the degraded rangeland treatment (46% degraded rangeland, 60% conserved woodland), but in hand-cutting reached only 3% cover. Hand-cutting reduced species richness and vegetation diversity, whereas roller-chopping had no effect. Shrub-removal treatments decreased normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI; proxy of green biomass) and modified ecosystem phenology. Under both shrub treatments, the maximum, minimum and integral NDVI (area under the NDVI curve) were significantly lower than those of the degraded rangeland treatment. The results suggest that shrub-removal practices increase forage for livestock, but reduce functional diversity and compromise the return to less disturbed states (woodland), where tree populations are maintained.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherCSIROes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceThe Rangeland Journal 44 (4) : 193-202. (23 February 2023)eng
dc.subjectGrassland Managementeng
dc.subjectManejo de Praderases_AR
dc.subjectBiomass Productioneng
dc.subjectProducción de Biomasaes_AR
dc.subjectGrazingeng
dc.subjectPastoreoes_AR
dc.subjectScrublandseng
dc.subjectTierras de Matorrales_AR
dc.subjectWoodlandseng
dc.subjectFormación Boscosaes_AR
dc.subjectGrazing Systemseng
dc.subjectArid Zoneseng
dc.subjectZona Aridaes_AR
dc.subjectArgentinaes_AR
dc.subject.otherWoody-plant Encroachmenteng
dc.titleIn search of sustainable livestock management in the Dry Chaco: effect of different shrub-removal practices on vegetationeng
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.description.origenEEA La Riojaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Guzman, Luis Miguel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Villagra, Pablo Eugenio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Villagra, Pablo Eugenio. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Quiroga, Raul Emiliano. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Catamarca; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Pereyra, Diego Ivan. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Pelliza, Ernesto Martin. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ricarte, Ramon Armando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Blanco, Lisandro Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess