Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
We monitored grazing behavior and habitat selection of Argentine Criollo (AC), South American heritage cattle breed, and Angus (AA) cows during summer and winter of 2016 (wetter year) and 2017 (drier year) at a site in La Rioja, Argentina. In each year and season, five AC and five AA cows were fitted with GPS collars configured to log animal position at 10-min intervals for 40 days. Movement, activity, and vegetation use patterns of each breed were [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Lisandro Javier
dc.contributor.authorUtsumi, Santiago A.
dc.contributor.authorCibils, Andrés Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCendoya, Maria Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorJaimes, Florencia
dc.contributor.authorMoltoni, Andres Fernando
dc.contributor.authorRicci, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-02T12:53:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-02T12:53:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.identifier.issn0140-1963
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104827
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12469
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140196322001227
dc.description.abstractWe monitored grazing behavior and habitat selection of Argentine Criollo (AC), South American heritage cattle breed, and Angus (AA) cows during summer and winter of 2016 (wetter year) and 2017 (drier year) at a site in La Rioja, Argentina. In each year and season, five AC and five AA cows were fitted with GPS collars configured to log animal position at 10-min intervals for 40 days. Movement, activity, and vegetation use patterns of each breed were derived from the GPS data. In summer, AC cows traveled similar daily distances, explored smaller (wetter year) or slightly larger (drier year) areas of the pasture, tended to move along more sinuous path trajectories, and showed stronger selection of the vegetation unit with higher forage quality and lowest woody cover compared to AA counterparts. AC cows allocated similar (wetter year) or more time to graze (drier year), allocated roughly the same amount of time to travel, and spent similar (wetter year) or less time resting (drier year) than AA cows. In winter, foraging behavior differences between breeds were only observed in the drier year. AC cows traveled farther and spent less time resting than AA counterparts that year. When comparing summer vs. winter movement patterns of each breed, AC cows showed an apparent greater ability to adapt to changing forage conditions (foraging plasticity) compared to AA counterparts which appeared to exhibit more rigid foraging patterns. Criollo cattle could be a tool to increase the resilience of Arid Chaco beef systems in the face of climate change. The rangeland conservation implications of raising Criollo vs. British beef cattle require further investigation.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceJournal of Arid Environments 206 : 104827 (November 2022)es_AR
dc.subjectGanado Bovinoes_AR
dc.subjectCattleeng
dc.subjectRazas (animales)es_AR
dc.subjectBreeds (animals)eng
dc.subjectPastoreoes_AR
dc.subjectGrazingeng
dc.subjectBúsqueda de Alimentoes_AR
dc.subjectForagingeng
dc.subjectTierras de Pastoses_AR
dc.subjectRangelandseng
dc.subject.otherRaza Criolla Argentinaes_AR
dc.subject.otherRaza Anguses_AR
dc.subject.otherForaging Behavioureng
dc.subject.otherRegión Chaco Semiáridoes_AR
dc.titleForaging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentinaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Catamarcaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Catamarca; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Blanco, Lisandro Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Utsumi, Santiago A. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cibils, Andrés Francisco. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cendoya, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Jaimes, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Moltoni, Andrés Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Ingeniería Rural; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ricci, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ricci, Patricia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación Para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem