Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
    • español
    • English
  • Contacto
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
AboutAuthorsTitlesSubjectsCollectionsCommunities☰
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
    xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Santa FeEEA RafaelaArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
  • DSpace Home
  • Centros Regionales y EEAs
  • Centro Regional Santa Fe
  • EEA Rafaela
  • Artículos científicos
  • View Item

The taxonomic status of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806)

Abstract
The brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu stricto, is a species with considerable public health and economic importance. However, the taxonomic status of this species is far from resolved. After more than 110 years of scientific work on R. sanguineus s.s., the situation is that there is no type, no solid description, nor is there a consensus about the range of morphological variability within the species. Recent findings based on laboratory [ver mas...]
The brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu stricto, is a species with considerable public health and economic importance. However, the taxonomic status of this species is far from resolved. After more than 110 years of scientific work on R. sanguineus s.s., the situation is that there is no type, no solid description, nor is there a consensus about the range of morphological variability within the species. Recent findings based on laboratory crosses and molecular genetics strongly suggest that there are several entities grouped under the same name. Here we review the history of the taxon, and we point out the caveats behind any further work on this tick. The current taxonomic status of R. sanguineus s.s. thus lacks an informative original description, and is based on the existence of several morphological descriptions based on ticks originating from different populations, which show, in some cases, biological incompatibility and significant genetic divergence. We suggests that as a result it is not possible to assign the specific name R. sanguineus s.s. to any population. Further work is required based on the rules issued by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to clearly define the morphological range of the different populations. [Cerrar]
Thumbnail
Author
Nava, Santiago;   Estrada-Peña, Agustín;   Petney, Trevor;   Beati, Lorenza;   Labruna, Marcelo B.;   Szabó, Matías P.J.;   Venzal, José Manuel;   Mastropaolo, Mariano;   Mangold, Atilio Jose;   Guglielmone, Alberto;  
Fuente
Veterinary parasitology 208 (1–2) : 2-8. (February 2015)
Date
2015-02
ISSN
0304-4017
URI
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401714006554?via%3Dihub#!
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2255
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.12.021
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Rhipicephalus Sanguineus; Metastigmata; Taxonomía; Taxonomy; Plagas de Animales; Pests of Animals; Garrapatas;
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Descargar
Compartir
  • Compartir
    Facebook Email Twitter Mendeley
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Metadata
Show full item record